Acquired
发表于 2025-4-1 04:53:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781557/781557_61.png
感激小女
发表于 2025-4-1 07:44:10
,‘Two Dogmas’ Redux,on of quantum mechanics as an alternative to the Everett interpretation. Following the analysis by Frauchiger and Renner of ‘encapsulated’ measurements (where a super-observer, with unrestricted ability to measure any arbitrary observable of a complex quantum system, measures the memory of an observ
Decimate
发表于 2025-4-1 13:31:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781557/781557_63.png
骂人有污点
发表于 2025-4-1 16:57:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781557/781557_64.png
修正案
发表于 2025-4-1 20:11:38
Quantum Mechanics As a Theory of Observables and States (And, Thereby, As a Theory of Probability),odds rational agents would accept on the outcomes of quantum gambles. On his view, quantum probability is subjective, and so are quantum states. We disagree. We take quantum states, and the probabilities they encode, to be objective matters of physics. Our disagreement has both technical and concept
埋伏
发表于 2025-4-2 00:23:40
The Measurement Problem and Two Dogmas About Quantum Mechanics,idding the use of the notion of measurement in the fundamental axioms of the theory; the second, imposing an interpretation of the quantum state as representing a system’s objectively possessed properties and evolution. In this paper I argue that, contrarily to Pitowsky analysis, depriving the quant
红润
发表于 2025-4-2 04:01:24
Is Quantum Mechanics a New Theory of Probability?,es a new theory or at least a novel interpretation of standard quantum mechanics. Itamar Pitowsky did not. Instead, he argued in a major paper (Pitowsky, Quantum mechanics as a theory of probability. In: Demopoulos W, Pitowsky I (eds) Physical theory and its interpretation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 2
Choreography
发表于 2025-4-2 08:53:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781557/781557_68.png
专心
发表于 2025-4-2 14:56:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781557/781557_69.png