调情
发表于 2025-3-28 14:44:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781548/781548_41.png
Rinne-Test
发表于 2025-3-28 20:48:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781548/781548_42.png
Strength
发表于 2025-3-28 23:57:49
Nicolas Gisin contexts, in practice as well as in theory. Beginning with specific problems, they move on to more general and theoretical considerations, seeking to go beyond over-simple ideas about cause and effect and the 978-90-481-7334-1978-1-4020-5308-5Series ISSN 1878-9447 Series E-ISSN 2543-0653
Awning
发表于 2025-3-29 03:34:44
on Neumann and Bohm was elegantly resolved by Bell, who showed that von Neumann‘s proof contained a physically unjustifiable assumption. So while John Bell had flung 978-3-642-07664-0978-3-662-05032-3
Indelible
发表于 2025-3-29 10:49:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781548/781548_45.png
craving
发表于 2025-3-29 13:20:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781548/781548_46.png
Deference
发表于 2025-3-29 16:51:35
Bell’s Theorem for Space-Like SeparationSoon after John Bell published his famous theorem first experiments were performed to test whether nature was compliant with local realistic theories or not. Now, more than 30 years later various groups are still trying to do better and better tests of the same sort, and indeed techniques have come remarkably close to ideal. So, why bother?
gusher
发表于 2025-3-29 21:44:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781548/781548_48.png
Omnipotent
发表于 2025-3-30 00:46:00
Sundays in a Quantum Engineer’s Life .. This is how John Bell opened his “underground colloquium” in March 1983; words which I will never forget! What! John Bell, the great John Bell, presented himself as an engineer!?! one of those people who make things work without even understanding how they function?!? In contrast I thought of John Bell as one of the greatest theoreticians..
grenade
发表于 2025-3-30 06:42:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7816/781548/781548_50.png