史前 发表于 2025-3-23 11:55:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_11.pngFOR 发表于 2025-3-23 14:15:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_12.pngcloture 发表于 2025-3-23 18:04:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_13.pngjarring 发表于 2025-3-24 01:01:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_14.pngFluctuate 发表于 2025-3-24 05:08:28
Wolfgang Lücke both as a room of state and as a privy space, a place for the successful deployment of soft, coercive power, was only beginning to be commonplace in the early seventeenth century when the play was first performed (1609–11). .’., stages the work of soft power diplomacy as a remedy for tyranny and as手势 发表于 2025-3-24 06:54:53
ism still assumes that the play allegorises either the displacement of justice by mercy or, in recent Aristotelian interpretations, the displacement of justice by equity, mercy’s classicised cousin (see Marx, 2000, ch. 5). Stacy Magedanz refines the mercy—justice debate by pointing out that the Duke生气的边缘 发表于 2025-3-24 14:07:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_17.png畏缩 发表于 2025-3-24 15:53:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_18.pngCoordinate 发表于 2025-3-24 19:32:22
Wolfgang Lücke book reveals debt’s ubiquity in life and literature. It considers debt’s function as a tie between the individual and the larger group and the ways in which debts structured the home, urban life, legal systems, and linguistic and literary forms. .978-3-030-59771-9978-3-030-59769-6Series ISSN 2946-5397 Series E-ISSN 2946-5400吸引力 发表于 2025-3-25 02:18:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/79/7805/780466/780466_20.png