类人猿
发表于 2025-3-23 13:38:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750475/750475_11.png
grotto
发表于 2025-3-23 16:55:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750475/750475_12.png
Enteropathic
发表于 2025-3-23 20:03:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750475/750475_13.png
ABYSS
发表于 2025-3-23 22:51:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750475/750475_14.png
corn732
发表于 2025-3-24 03:12:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750475/750475_15.png
合群
发表于 2025-3-24 10:34:59
Overview: 978-1-349-06736-7978-1-349-06734-3
文艺
发表于 2025-3-24 14:23:25
Introductionn unresolvable controversy. On the other hand, it would not be difficult to find agreement on who the frontrunners for such an honour would be. In any list of candidates, several names would be likely to appear: Dušan Makavejev, discussed in the preceding chapter, Andrzej Wajda, Mikls Jancsó and Milos Forman.
jabber
发表于 2025-3-24 15:10:17
Andrzej Wajda’s Vision of One Country’s Past and Presentf Polish society. Or perhaps the phrase ‘social and cultural dilemmas’ has too pretentious a ring. Would it not be less high-flown to seek in Wajda’s films a reflection of a certain country and its life, concerns and dramas?
不适当
发表于 2025-3-24 20:55:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/76/7505/750475/750475_19.png
Dungeon
发表于 2025-3-25 00:23:10
Toward an East European Cinemarxism?I believe in the avoidance of neologisms, and it embarrasses me (if only momentarily) to announce my subject with a made-up term that is also a pun. A new word is so often lacking in authenticity and complexity of references to antecedent reality and thinking; and puns, well …