Carbon-Monoxide 发表于 2025-3-23 13:30:33
Philosophical Constructivism and Critical Constructivism Combined: Kratochwil’s Account of the Condits, built on boundaries which, once scrutinised, can be seen to be predicated on illegitimate foundations, is key. The insistence on a delineation between various forms of reasoning into unique ‘categories’ (e.g. the category of practical reason; the category of institutional reason; the category of叙述 发表于 2025-3-23 17:39:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705229/705229_12.png有害处 发表于 2025-3-23 19:29:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705229/705229_13.pngInflated 发表于 2025-3-24 01:05:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705229/705229_14.pngPhagocytes 发表于 2025-3-24 04:45:43
Overcoming the Poststructuralist Critique? Walker. The fundamental point espoused by that critique is, I argued, that the discipline of IR is built on covert normative foundations which serve to construct and perpetuate dichotomised categories of rationality/anarchy and which exclude the philosophical space required to challenge the basis o使更活跃 发表于 2025-3-24 08:31:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705229/705229_16.pngAggregate 发表于 2025-3-24 12:33:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705229/705229_17.pngpadding 发表于 2025-3-24 18:53:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7053/705229/705229_18.png短程旅游 发表于 2025-3-24 21:42:17
Philosophical Constructivism and Critical Constructivism Combined: Kratochwil’s Account of the Condiinly one I wish to take seriously. An account of the underpinnings of normative claims in international relations cannot but engage with the fact that normative projects must find a way to dispel boundaries between moral, practical, legal and institutional reasoning, all of which will play crucial rGoblet-Cells 发表于 2025-3-25 01:32:48
The Concept of the Reasonable in International Political Justification: A Rejoinder to the Poststruceptualise the structure of a ‘complete’ account of normative reason. Such an account, I argued, has the potential to augment synthesised conceptions of practical, moral and legal reasoning, anchored around an account of normatively secured common understandings (as developed in detail by Kratochwil)