值得尊敬 发表于 2025-3-25 06:20:14
Naturalistic Conceptions of Human and Animal Rights: From Human Exceptionalism to Transspecies Univman rights? The starting point of this inquiry is the ‘traditional’ or ‘orthodox’ understanding of human rights, which is the naturalistic conception. This much can be said already: considering the contested nature and philosophical foundations of human rights, there cannot be a simple, let alone si项目 发表于 2025-3-25 10:23:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_22.png别名 发表于 2025-3-25 12:09:14
One Rights: Indivisibility and Interdependence of Human and Animal Rights,as new human rights. Accepting animal rights as the next generation of (non)human rights would constitute a seismic shift and likely lead to the formation of a new (post-)human rights paradigm. Based on the indivisibility and interdependence of human and animal rights, this chapter proposes One Righ透明 发表于 2025-3-25 16:54:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_24.pngoctogenarian 发表于 2025-3-25 20:10:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_25.pngMelanoma 发表于 2025-3-26 01:40:39
2192-855Xthe animal question.Develops the novel One Rights approach This is an open access book.Animals are the traditional blind spot in human rights theory. This book brings together the seemingly disparate discourses of human and animal rights, and looks at emerging animal rights as new human rights. ItEuthyroid 发表于 2025-3-26 05:25:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_27.png大雨 发表于 2025-3-26 11:01:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_28.png行业 发表于 2025-3-26 16:12:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_29.png我的巨大 发表于 2025-3-26 20:28:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7015/701456/701456_30.png