绿州
发表于 2025-3-23 11:02:02
From Joy to the Gap: The Accessing of the Infinite by the Finite (Spinoza, Nietzsche, Bergson),he chapter looks in some detail at Henri Bergson’s celebrated cone of memory — the diagram mentioned above — from . (cited in references as .). Here, I am interested in a certain gap that, again, allows a passage from one intensive state to another, and especially, in Bergson’s terms, to beyond the
EWER
发表于 2025-3-23 13:57:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7013/701270/701270_12.png
condone
发表于 2025-3-23 18:14:57
Desiring-Machines, Chaoids, Probe-heads: Towards a Speculative Production of Subjectivity (Deleuze l organization of subjectivity against more dominant forms of subjection, or what Deleuze and Guattari call faciality. This third section also attempts to think this production of subjectivity through in relation to two case studies, and, as far as this goes, follows what I think is a key modality o
PAN
发表于 2025-3-23 23:02:08
978-1-137-43028-1Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012
令人不快
发表于 2025-3-24 03:55:39
http://image.papertrans.cn/o/image/701270.jpg
oxidant
发表于 2025-3-24 07:26:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7013/701270/701270_16.png
为现场
发表于 2025-3-24 13:39:09
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032676ethics; Friedrich Nietzsche; Michel Foucault; philosophy; Spinoza
set598
发表于 2025-3-24 18:41:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7013/701270/701270_18.png
defibrillator
发表于 2025-3-24 20:54:25
Conclusion: Composite Diagram and Relations of Adjacency,As a conclusion to this book we might subtract the proper names — and indeed all the discursive material — and map out this book’s diagrammatic trajectory as in Figure 6.1.
Esophagus
发表于 2025-3-25 02:44:21
Haydar Göksu,Nursefa Zengin,Hilal Acıdereli,Ayşenur Aygün,Kemal Cellat,Fatih Şenonvincing defence. A Pyrrhonian sceptic, for example, claims that we never have good grounds for adopting a definite position on anything because for every argument in favour of a particular doctrine or claim there is an equally strong argument against this argument or claim. This Pyrrhonian sceptic