CRATE 发表于 2025-3-23 12:42:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7012/701136/701136_11.png外观 发表于 2025-3-23 15:43:27
978-90-247-1926-6Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977不易燃 发表于 2025-3-23 19:24:30
Melbourne International Philosophy Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/o/image/701136.jpg裂口 发表于 2025-3-24 02:14:59
Act, Content, and Object of the Judgment,It appears likely that judgments are similar to presentations in regard to the distinction between content and object. If it is possible to discover a difference also between the content and the object of the mental phenomenon called judgment, then this should help to clarify the analogous relationship for presentations.Licentious 发表于 2025-3-24 04:37:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7012/701136/701136_15.pngopportune 发表于 2025-3-24 09:50:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7012/701136/701136_16.pngacolyte 发表于 2025-3-24 13:20:25
Act, Content, and Object of the Presentation,e of such a relation is a characteristic feature of mental phenomena which are by means of it distinguished from the physical phenomena. There always corresponds to the mental phenomena of being presented with something, of judging, of desiring, and of detesting something presented, something judgedGraves’-disease 发表于 2025-3-24 15:02:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7012/701136/701136_18.pngTortuous 发表于 2025-3-24 22:42:36
,The “Presented”,makes a precise distinction between content and object more difficult. We have said already that the content and the object of a presentation are not in the same sense “something presented.” We shall now try to determine what the expression ‘presented’ means when it is applied to the object of a preNefarious 发表于 2025-3-25 02:31:11
,So-Called “Objectless” Presentations,e must distinguish, not only the content from the act, but also from these entities a third one, namely, the object. Now, there is the obvious objection to this view that there are “objectless” presentations; presentations, to which there correspond no objects. If so, then our previous consideration