暗指
发表于 2025-3-28 16:47:28
On Skidelsky’s Keynes (2005)of the twentieth century, certainly the greatest biography of an economist. We agree with Bradford De Long’s judgment: ‘as a whole, is the finest biography of an economist that I have ever read, or that I expect ever to read’ (De Long, 2002, 155). Skidelsky’s fundamental aim in the three volume
Radiculopathy
发表于 2025-3-28 21:15:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701074/701074_42.png
medieval
发表于 2025-3-29 00:43:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701074/701074_43.png
容易做
发表于 2025-3-29 07:03:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701074/701074_44.png
扩音器
发表于 2025-3-29 07:50:10
The Theoretical and Political Importance of the Economics of Keynes: Or, What Would Marx and Keynes modern capitalism of the past 30 to 40 years than do the more modern approaches to macroeconomics of the same period; and, second, that Keynes would have sat down and tried again to save capitalism from itself.† (Marx may have rubbed his hands and hoped that its demise, so often predicted by him and
钻孔
发表于 2025-3-29 11:49:34
The Rise and, Hopefully, the Fall of Economic Neo-Liberalism in Theory and Practice (2009)has been an outlet for independent and outspoken, often unfashionable views, upholding traditions steeped in the thoughts of Michal Kalecki and Maynard Keynes, and some of Australia’s wisest economists. (Even Karl Marx gets a mention.) I am most grateful to the editors for asking me to be their open
贝雷帽
发表于 2025-3-29 18:35:14
Price Theory and Multinational Oligopoly: Kurt Rothschild and Stephen Hymer Revisited (2009)ns and weaknesses of the imperfect and monopolistic competition theories, which were then only in their second decade, as illuminators of actual price and other behaviour. Finding them wanting, at least for considerable portions of observed, real world behaviour, especially when oligopolistic struct
Indelible
发表于 2025-3-29 21:05:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701074/701074_48.png
秘传
发表于 2025-3-30 02:55:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701074/701074_49.png
Amplify
发表于 2025-3-30 05:19:48
Keynes and the Cambridge School (2003)me agreeing and extending, others disagreeing and/ or returning to ideas Keynes sloughed off or played down. . is the natural starting point. We trace developments from and reactions to it, especially by people who were associated, at least for part of their working lives, with Cambridge, England. I