amygdala
发表于 2025-3-28 18:16:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701056/701056_41.png
硬化
发表于 2025-3-28 21:48:43
Considering the Capability Perspectiveticisms of Rawls’ central assumptions, and in so doing provides us with some interesting questions regarding the status of non-compliant agents in his theory, which throw light on our discussion of burdened societies and the duty of assistance owed to them.
compose
发表于 2025-3-28 23:32:33
A Duty in Equilibrium? the previous chapter be too much to expect from largely autonomous peoples lacking extensive shared histories and institutions? Do they threaten the integrity of some peoples and thus threaten stability? Or could they be construed as ethnocentric: Western policies that are antithetical to Rawls’ political constructivism?
烧烤
发表于 2025-3-29 04:25:02
Creeping Cosmopolitanism?nge of global poverty. It provides the basis for a response to some of Sen’s key criticisms, and despite being more pragmatic in its aspirations than some cosmopolitan ideals, it remains a far-reaching principle worthy of consideration by those of an idealist persuasion.
precede
发表于 2025-3-29 07:16:22
The Cosmopolitan Critiqueustice and equality — some of whom were themselves inspired by Rawls. Their own interpretation and development of Rawls’ work in the international sphere provides an important context for understanding their critical response.
态学
发表于 2025-3-29 14:03:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701056/701056_46.png
意见一致
发表于 2025-3-29 17:35:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7011/701056/701056_47.png