Permanent
发表于 2025-3-25 06:13:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7009/700818/700818_21.png
Bombast
发表于 2025-3-25 10:14:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7009/700818/700818_22.png
alcoholism
发表于 2025-3-25 13:57:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7009/700818/700818_23.png
邪恶的你
发表于 2025-3-25 16:51:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7009/700818/700818_24.png
我不重要
发表于 2025-3-25 21:47:28
The Diplomatic Imagination,ivity to the shades of leverage—is, in the better examples, a rare gift and a calling that lies somewhere between art, science, politics and morality. This gift is what discriminates between the old and the new, and allows for the preservation of one amid the embrace of the other.
BLOT
发表于 2025-3-26 02:35:29
Book 2014t overview, historian Kenneth Weisbrode reminds us that to understand diplomatic transformations and their relevance to international affairs is to see diplomacy as an entrepreneurial art and that, like most arts, it is adapted and re-adapted with reference to earlier forms. Diplomatic practice is always changing, and always continuous.
GREG
发表于 2025-3-26 06:33:18
s is to see diplomacy as an entrepreneurial art and that, like most arts, it is adapted and re-adapted with reference to earlier forms. Diplomatic practice is always changing, and always continuous.978-1-137-39308-1
Noisome
发表于 2025-3-26 10:46:08
Book 2014of New Diplomacy emerged only a couple of generations later. Moreover, "Diplomacy 2.0" and other variants of the post-Cold War era do not depart significantly from their twentieth-century predecessor: their forms, particularly in technology, have changed, but their substance has not. In this succinc
OREX
发表于 2025-3-26 13:51:41
Old-New Diplomacy,preserved peace in Europe itself by devising a communitarian, collaborative language for diplomacy without discarding the balance of power; and it recast geopolitical problems as “functional” issues, which diminished their tendency to start wars.
江湖郎中
发表于 2025-3-26 20:00:06
Old-Old Diplomacy,s preservation of order and peace; its code of conduct; and its capacity for self-regulation. Its weakness was its generally closed, opaque nature. Its eclipse after the First World War was some time in coming—about thirty years—yet many of its ways and attitudes persist today.