决定性
发表于 2025-3-23 10:55:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_11.png
Prostaglandins
发表于 2025-3-23 16:49:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_12.png
outset
发表于 2025-3-23 21:24:14
History,e clearly put than by the logical positivists. As presented by Carnap, the positivists’ position associates scientific meaningfulness with observability, and the association is carried out in terms of the language of science. Sentences are to be regarded as scientifically meaningful only if the cons
纠缠,缠绕
发表于 2025-3-24 01:06:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_14.png
好色
发表于 2025-3-24 05:01:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_15.png
HERTZ
发表于 2025-3-24 07:07:22
Peter Kossoterpretation, attributing to them qualities stemming from what is believed to be some kind of emotional or personal flaw in Shelley’s make-up. I too read these figures as personal, but in the way of exemplifying (allegorising) Shelley’s deep concern with his idea of himself as a poet. He is not so m
tinnitus
发表于 2025-3-24 11:46:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_17.png
chandel
发表于 2025-3-24 15:46:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_18.png
Conspiracy
发表于 2025-3-24 22:41:53
Peter Kossos not have the sense of ‘frightful overwhelming refinement’, of blissful domesticity, of an exclusion from real life and the real world. The papers do have a certain coarseness which is sincere. Their idiom is the idiom of a class, not the parroted jargon of an élite. In their form and subject matte
悠然
发表于 2025-3-25 01:23:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7004/700334/700334_20.png