Eschew
发表于 2025-3-21 17:11:59
书目名称Objects and Identity影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Objects and Identity读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0700230<br><br> <br><br>
mucous-membrane
发表于 2025-3-21 23:44:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7003/700230/700230_2.png
Vulnerary
发表于 2025-3-22 03:24:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7003/700230/700230_3.png
PRO
发表于 2025-3-22 06:10:14
" all others. The scholastics inherited the idea (and the tenninology), classifying same as one of the "transcendentals", i.e. as running through all the categories. The work of Locke and l.eibniz made the concept a problematic one. But it is rather recently, i.e. since the importance of Frege has b
乏味
发表于 2025-3-22 10:14:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7003/700230/700230_5.png
PACK
发表于 2025-3-22 13:40:01
Diachronic Identity as Relative Identity,ore the notion of a sortal concept for a while. When Wiggins comes to discuss arguments against his view what he discusses are arguments designed to prove that certain . absolute equivalence relations are actually relative, and he tries to show that these are bad arguments.
ellagic-acid
发表于 2025-3-22 19:11:23
Sortal Concepts and Identity,why this principle should not be abandoned this constitutes an objection to these claims and also a justification, if like Wiggins one finds Quine’s four-dimensional ontology unpalatable, for denying that Pis now a man or that Tib is a cat when Tibbles has lost his tail.
生气地
发表于 2025-3-22 23:54:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7003/700230/700230_8.png
平庸的人或物
发表于 2025-3-23 05:20:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/71/7003/700230/700230_9.png
运动性
发表于 2025-3-23 09:17:17
Events, Continuants and Diachronic Identity, we have so far seen reason to favour. When we have isolated this point of disagreement, however, we shall see that our arguments up to now are not sufficient to decide between the opposing positions. Later on I shall state another argument which does so.