无限
发表于 2025-3-21 16:31:26
书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nursing Law and Ethics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0669474<br><br> <br><br>
积习已深
发表于 2025-3-21 23:05:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6695/669474/669474_2.png
原告
发表于 2025-3-22 00:55:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6695/669474/669474_3.png
烧烤
发表于 2025-3-22 05:48:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6695/669474/669474_4.png
奖牌
发表于 2025-3-22 10:17:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6695/669474/669474_5.png
Cervical-Spine
发表于 2025-3-22 14:37:09
ituaries characterizing post-modernity — the end of ‘Man’, the end of history, the end of metaphysics. Decisively answering these critics in the preface to the English translation, Marion argues instead that ‘Under the title . we do not mean to insinuate that God is not, or that God is not truly God
HAUNT
发表于 2025-3-22 19:57:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6695/669474/669474_7.png
Excise
发表于 2025-3-22 22:01:46
ainty and an attitude to textuality which prefigures more contemporary theory, and post-structuralist approaches to transcendence.. St John of the Cross’s writing will then be analysed with reference to processes of signification that are openended and question textual authority and interpretation.
COUCH
发表于 2025-3-23 02:19:58
eing’ (xx). But how can we designate that which is radically indifferent to Being, not only to the ontic differences between what is and what is not, but also, more fundamentally, to the unthought ontological difference that constitutes the opening of that ‘between’? A very Schellingian question to ask, as it turns out.
LAITY
发表于 2025-3-23 08:07:59
eing’ (xx). But how can we designate that which is radically indifferent to Being, not only to the ontic differences between what is and what is not, but also, more fundamentally, to the unthought ontological difference that constitutes the opening of that ‘between’? A very Schellingian question to ask, as it turns out.