类型
发表于 2025-3-23 13:26:42
Computer assisted number theory with applications,
残废的火焰
发表于 2025-3-23 13:53:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6689/668843/668843_12.png
Gnrh670
发表于 2025-3-23 19:26:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6689/668843/668843_13.png
先驱
发表于 2025-3-23 22:12:10
On the number of false witnesses for a composite number,
弄皱
发表于 2025-3-24 03:01:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6689/668843/668843_15.png
Handedness
发表于 2025-3-24 07:27:40
Paul Erdös,Carl Pomerance a free-electron model, which we consider unsatisfactory. We define “electrons” and “holes” in terms of the cur- tures of the Fermi surface. “Electrons” (1) and “holes” (2) are different and so they are assigned with different effective masses: Blatt, Schafroth and Butler proposed to explain superco
Detonate
发表于 2025-3-24 13:18:13
D. Hajela,B. Smith a free-electron model, which we consider unsatisfactory. We define “electrons” and “holes” in terms of the cur- tures of the Fermi surface. “Electrons” (1) and “holes” (2) are different and so they are assigned with different effective masses: Blatt, Schafroth and Butler proposed to explain superco
Exploit
发表于 2025-3-24 18:25:56
David Harbater a free-electron model, which we consider unsatisfactory. We define “electrons” and “holes” in terms of the cur- tures of the Fermi surface. “Electrons” (1) and “holes” (2) are different and so they are assigned with different effective masses: Blatt, Schafroth and Butler proposed to explain superco
万花筒
发表于 2025-3-24 21:55:22
William L. Hoyt a free-electron model, which we consider unsatisfactory. We define “electrons” and “holes” in terms of the cur- tures of the Fermi surface. “Electrons” (1) and “holes” (2) are different and so they are assigned with different effective masses: Blatt, Schafroth and Butler proposed to explain superco
Infirm
发表于 2025-3-25 00:32:40
The depth of rings of invariants over finite fields,son invariants u.=c. (, ). We conjecture that the depth of S(V). is the largest r such that u.,...,u. is a regular sequence on S(V)., and show this to be true if depth S(V). is 1, 2, n−1 or n. We also give a proof, using Steenrod operations, that over a prime field ., depth S(V).≥3 implies u., u., u. is a regular sequence on S(V)..