florid
发表于 2025-3-27 00:12:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6683/668262/668262_31.png
nominal
发表于 2025-3-27 02:24:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4153-7Finite; Mathematica; axiom of choice; language; mathematics; object; ordinal; recursion; set; set theory; sets
享乐主义者
发表于 2025-3-27 08:03:13
Equinumerosity,After these preliminaries, we can formulate the fundamental definitions of Cantor about the size or cardinality of sets.
显赫的人
发表于 2025-3-27 11:03:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6683/668262/668262_34.png
EVADE
发表于 2025-3-27 16:38:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6683/668262/668262_35.png
Cacophonous
发表于 2025-3-27 17:50:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6683/668262/668262_36.png
领带
发表于 2025-3-28 01:21:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6683/668262/668262_37.png
蜈蚣
发表于 2025-3-28 04:01:46
Are Sets All There is?,tal theorem . of Cantor is about the set ? of real numbers, etc. Put another way, the results of Chapter 2 are not only about sets, but about points, numbers, functions, Cartesian products and many other mathematical objects which are plainly not sets. Where will we find these objects in the axioms of Zermelo which speak only about sets?
AVERT
发表于 2025-3-28 09:23:43
Replacement and Other Axioms,set construction no less plausible than any of the constructive axioms (.) – (.) but powerful in its consequences. We will also introduce and discuss some additional principles which are often included in axiomatizations of set theory.
offense
发表于 2025-3-28 10:28:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6683/668262/668262_40.png