方便
发表于 2025-3-26 23:16:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6682/668143/668143_31.png
evaculate
发表于 2025-3-27 03:19:10
Volkan Ipekalectical resolution of the competing assertions of self-satisfying egoist superiorities. In contrast to privileging relationships of domination, he offers a phenomenology of the unrelenting obsession with responsibility for the other, in works such as ... As a philosopher, he raises questions about
parsimony
发表于 2025-3-27 08:08:41
Volkan Ipekttack the Nazi regime … in the name of Goethe, Schiller, and, of course, Kant himself”. According to Fackenheim, for his valiant criticism of the Nazi government, Menzer “could have relied on no more suitable text than Kant’s Categorical Imperative” (xxxv), which Fackenheim summarizes according to t
Migratory
发表于 2025-3-27 11:56:31
Volkan Ipekies what has been noted in the interpretation of many published Holocaust memoirs by women: that is, we can discern a feminist ethic of caring, derived from the socialization of women and the cultural norms in the pre-Holocaust era, that women, consciously or otherwise, applied to the extreme condit
DAMN
发表于 2025-3-27 13:53:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6682/668143/668143_35.png
青少年
发表于 2025-3-27 20:50:02
to serve the interests of genocide. To the extent that philosophers—moral philosophers in particular—have paid close attention to the Holocaust (not many, unfortunately, have done so), a significant version of the double bind that Sarah Kofman (1934–1994) identified in . is definitely in effect. On
acrimony
发表于 2025-3-27 23:04:04
10楼
变态
发表于 2025-3-28 06:01:59
10楼