船员
发表于 2025-3-26 21:02:40
Stichprobenbeschreibung,gs maximal 60 Studierende des Studiengangs die formalen Zugangsvoraussetzungen. Die Zahl der Anmeldungen für beide Blockseminare lag bei 37 Studierenden. Da die maximale Teilnehmerzahl damit überschritten war, erfolgte die Zulassung per Losverfahren. Von den 15 zum ersten Seminar zugelosten Personen
Parley
发表于 2025-3-27 04:24:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6680/667935/667935_32.png
意见一致
发表于 2025-3-27 06:24:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6680/667935/667935_33.png
archetype
发表于 2025-3-27 10:29:29
Astrid Steinmetztells us that educational leadership varies from different social and culture, but we still could find common points or inspirations from others, at least, educational leadership goes toward to deliver the future..The study includes critical discussion and conceptualization and contribute to a case-study of comparative education.
桶去微染
发表于 2025-3-27 16:54:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6680/667935/667935_35.png
BIPED
发表于 2025-3-27 19:17:05
Astrid Steinmetzsisting marked by a vision of service in the development of a common good and the trust in professionalism of teachers. Local governance is often no longer linked to the pilot but rather to the purpose of the steering and control arrangements, while leadership is built in a matrix way within each institution.
deadlock
发表于 2025-3-28 01:47:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6680/667935/667935_37.png
Mercantile
发表于 2025-3-28 06:07:45
Astrid Steinmetztional history canon, enacted a logic of fame in which inclusions and exclusions are justified in relation to a native public. The chapter ends by suggesting that, recently, the struggle over Dutch citizenship might have shifted once more: away from a focus on ‘identity crisis’ and towards renewed questions of race and injustice.
preeclampsia
发表于 2025-3-28 08:09:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6680/667935/667935_39.png
CRASS
发表于 2025-3-28 10:24:32
Astrid Steinmetztional history canon, enacted a logic of fame in which inclusions and exclusions are justified in relation to a native public. The chapter ends by suggesting that, recently, the struggle over Dutch citizenship might have shifted once more: away from a focus on ‘identity crisis’ and towards renewed questions of race and injustice.