peritonitis 发表于 2025-3-23 11:24:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6673/667271/667271_11.pngTremor 发表于 2025-3-23 15:43:43
Nonexistent Objects978-94-015-8214-8Series ISSN 0924-4530牛马之尿 发表于 2025-3-23 19:36:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6673/667271/667271_13.pngstrain 发表于 2025-3-24 00:39:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8214-8English literature; bibliography; individual; intention; interpret; issue; literature; metaphysics; nature; pURN 发表于 2025-3-24 02:21:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6673/667271/667271_15.png使成核 发表于 2025-3-24 09:18:34
,The Nature of Meinong’s Objects: Existent and Nonexistent,suggests that existent and nonexistent (i.e. beingless) objects . or . properties. But one might wonder whether this talk is a bit loose, and whether Meinong really meant that objects, i.e. at least nonexistent ones, . properties or combinations of properties, instead of things which have or exemplify properties.昆虫 发表于 2025-3-24 10:43:40
Two Main Arguments for Nonexistents,hat I take to be the two main arguments for nonexistent objects found in Meinong, viz. the argument from negative existentials and the argument from intentionality.. I will argue that neither of these is a convincing argument for . objects.得意人 发表于 2025-3-24 15:03:00
0924-4530 szyk takes his readers surefootedly through thisthicket, informed both historically and at the level of contemporarydiscussion of relevant themes. His main aim is to develop a `bundle‘or `set of properties‘ interpretation of Meinong‘s theory ofnonexistent objects (as opposed to a set of properties nBROOK 发表于 2025-3-24 21:51:21
Book 1993e Meinong who emerges is neither the hero nor the villainhis friends and foes have commonly led us to believe..This clearly written book is a valuable addition both to theliterature on Meinong and to contemporary metaphysics of modality. Itis written for students and professionals interested in these, andrelated, areas..Aura231 发表于 2025-3-25 02:19:27
Introductory Considerations,d we were duly impressed. As Karel Lambert aptly remarks, ‘Graduate students from 1905 on have participated vicariously in Russell’s destruction of the Meinongian edifice, usually with the open glee of an architectural critic at contemplating the annihilation of Disneyland’(, p. 34n).