Awkward
发表于 2025-3-21 16:33:57
书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0666817<br><br> <br><br>
食物
发表于 2025-3-21 21:29:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666817/666817_2.png
CURT
发表于 2025-3-22 02:35:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666817/666817_3.png
压碎
发表于 2025-3-22 06:31:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666817/666817_4.png
Exuberance
发表于 2025-3-22 09:35:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666817/666817_5.png
Brocas-Area
发表于 2025-3-22 15:29:41
The Individual Ontology and Ideology,ledge is knowledge of the individual, all general knowledge is derived and the general has no ontological status whatsoever; the general is a product of the mind. Therefore we shall first dig up the roots of the medieval discussion, then expose the medieval points of view. This will enable us to und
不能根除
发表于 2025-3-22 19:33:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666817/666817_7.png
演讲
发表于 2025-3-22 22:24:30
Thought and Language Intentions and Intensions,d concerning language are much more in accordance with the results of sciences that did not even exist in their days, such as ethology, neurobiology, psycholinguistics, than many philosophical, psychological or linguistic theories that are proposed today. Behaviourism and some cognitivistic theories
reperfusion
发表于 2025-3-23 02:01:31
Nominalism, Empiricism and Conventionalism,died. These theories depart in many points from logical empiricism, they have relativistic and conventionalistic traits, which are not congenial to the spirit of Carnap’s philosophy. How can we explain these tendencies and what conclusions can we draw? Is their source to be found in nominalism and/o
Postulate
发表于 2025-3-23 06:17:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6669/666817/666817_10.png