侵略者
发表于 2025-3-25 05:17:26
Book 2018ion (.Dichtung.), the humanities (.Geisteswissenschaften.), and science (.Wissenschaft.). Overall, the essays consider internal connections between different aspects of Frege’s work while acknowledging the importance of its philosophical context...There are also further common strands between the pa
Prologue
发表于 2025-3-25 08:42:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6652/665188/665188_22.png
Hiatus
发表于 2025-3-25 14:19:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6652/665188/665188_23.png
讽刺滑稽戏剧
发表于 2025-3-25 18:50:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6652/665188/665188_24.png
Limerick
发表于 2025-3-25 21:19:46
Agrammaticality,r the form of poetry. The therapeutic consequences of this view are discussed in connection with Deleuze’s comments on Melville and with Read’s comments on Sass, which offer very different views of agrammaticality.
BILE
发表于 2025-3-26 02:10:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6652/665188/665188_26.png
Trypsin
发表于 2025-3-26 06:10:38
Science and Fiction: A Fregean Approach, makes a strict distinction between . on the level of object language but not on the level of metalanguage. (1) In his “On Sense and Reference” and in scattered remarks elsewhere Frege explains the semantics (and pragmatics) of scientific and everyday discourse. As a kind of side product he presents
愚蠢人
发表于 2025-3-26 09:26:18
,Frege’s Unquestioned Starting Point: Logic as Science,ore or less rigid system of judgements and (3) a science presupposes elucidations, illustrative examples and a “catch on” among scientists. Together, I label these three features “The scientific Picture”. Both logic and mathematics are included among the sciences and are covered by the scientific pi
勤劳
发表于 2025-3-26 14:47:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6652/665188/665188_29.png
Cerebrovascular
发表于 2025-3-26 19:13:04
,Frege’s Critique of Formalism,express a sense and arithmetical rules are grounded in the reference of the signs, to ., exemplified in particular by J. Thomae, whose “formal standpoint”, according to Frege, is that arithmetic should be understood as a manipulation of meaningless figures. However, Frege’s discussion of Thomae’s an