guzzle 发表于 2025-3-23 13:40:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6639/663822/663822_11.pngMagnificent 发表于 2025-3-23 16:43:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6639/663822/663822_12.pngSPURN 发表于 2025-3-23 21:29:10
is uneasiness in the temporal dimension. The present becomes confused with the past, the future flattens on the present, past and present are fleeing toward the future. Our uneasiness makes us believe that our happiness or unhappiness is a mode of being of time and prevents us from seeing that timelattice 发表于 2025-3-23 22:43:17
K. Pinhard,F. Müller-Spahn,G. Laux,Th. Zilker,H. Berzewski,H. Berzewski,Th. Messer,M. Schmauß,Th. Müving at each moment. This distance may be the modern version of the traditional difference between the lifeless and empty (.) . and the Lively .. The former rather should be called the “body-thing” (body as a thing) and the latter the “living flesh.” In German the former is called . and the latter .拥护者 发表于 2025-3-24 04:51:31
Ch. E. Elger,J. Bauer,W. Löschernscendental phenomenology. If Husserl attempts to describe the personal I as a ‘psycho-physical unity’. this is not to be seen as ontological realism, which could imply the equal validity of the observations of the natural sciences and of the human sciences. According to his position of transcendent微尘 发表于 2025-3-24 08:26:25
M. Gerlach,S. Walitza,J. Seifert,A. Warnke,M. Gerlach,S. Walitza,J. Seifert,A. Warnke,G. -E. Trott,A is uneasiness in the temporal dimension. The present becomes confused with the past, the future flattens on the present, past and present are fleeing toward the future. Our uneasiness makes us believe that our happiness or unhappiness is a mode of being of time and prevents us from seeing that timeConnotation 发表于 2025-3-24 13:17:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6639/663822/663822_17.pngMARS 发表于 2025-3-24 16:02:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6639/663822/663822_18.png吞下 发表于 2025-3-24 21:20:18
tant evidence for his views about crime and punishment—if only we can understand how the argument is supposed to work. It is our project in this paper to do that. We argue that there are two main problems with the argument: one is that it is not obvious how to make the argument valid; the other is tCLEFT 发表于 2025-3-25 00:57:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6639/663822/663822_20.png