remission 发表于 2025-3-23 10:22:02
Simon Hewittmained faithful.” Witty as this observation may be, narcissism is no laughing matter. The satisfaction that narcissism brings is very transient, because self-centeredness hinders the outward focus that is essential to good relationships. Bertrand Russell noted that we should “aim at avoiding self-ceGREG 发表于 2025-3-23 16:00:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6624/662380/662380_12.pngInstantaneous 发表于 2025-3-23 18:53:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6624/662380/662380_13.pngengender 发表于 2025-3-24 01:50:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6624/662380/662380_14.pngmitral-valve 发表于 2025-3-24 03:37:41
Analytic Apophaticisms,equent development of a new analytic approach to apophaticism. As a result of this engagement I place constraints on this development: that it be compatible with the truth of (a) Christian doctrine, and (b) DDI.背心 发表于 2025-3-24 08:32:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6624/662380/662380_16.pnglibertine 发表于 2025-3-24 12:35:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6624/662380/662380_17.png从属 发表于 2025-3-24 15:39:58
The Grammar of God-Talk,city. God is radically dissimilar from creatures, and occupies no shared logical space with them. As a consequence, many attempts to speak of God are category mistakes (which are understood here as semantically defective). The chapter concludes with a discussion of the status of the word ‘God’.adipose-tissue 发表于 2025-3-24 21:54:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6624/662380/662380_19.png六边形 发表于 2025-3-25 02:49:30
Is God a Person?, is nevertheless the right result, using the relationships between personhood, animality, and language to make the case that God is not a person. I defend this position against a suggestion of Leftow’s, that Christian practice only makes sense in the context of belief in divine personhood.