栏杆
发表于 2025-3-25 04:42:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661994/661994_21.png
CHIDE
发表于 2025-3-25 08:37:36
h programme was the proliferation of logical paradoxes around the turn of the century. The central assumption or “hard core” of the programme is the assumption that no contradiction is true, and hence that the reasonings which result in the contradictions must be fallacious. The aim has been to loca
habitat
发表于 2025-3-25 13:52:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661994/661994_23.png
Vsd168
发表于 2025-3-25 16:17:06
ttention. For the most part the focus of studies of self-reference has been on its logical and linguistic aspects, with perhaps disproportionate emphasis placed on the reflexive paradoxes. The eight-volume Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, for example, does not contain a single entry in its inde
讲个故事逗他
发表于 2025-3-25 22:32:18
M. Eagleh programme was the proliferation of logical paradoxes around the turn of the century. The central assumption or “hard core” of the programme is the assumption that no contradiction is true, and hence that the reasonings which result in the contradictions must be fallacious. The aim has been to loca
accessory
发表于 2025-3-26 02:10:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661994/661994_26.png
BORE
发表于 2025-3-26 05:53:07
David Gruenderh programme was the proliferation of logical paradoxes around the turn of the century. The central assumption or “hard core” of the programme is the assumption that no contradiction is true, and hence that the reasonings which result in the contradictions must be fallacious. The aim has been to loca
准则
发表于 2025-3-26 12:08:39
ttention. For the most part the focus of studies of self-reference has been on its logical and linguistic aspects, with perhaps disproportionate emphasis placed on the reflexive paradoxes. The eight-volume Macmillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, for example, does not contain a single entry in its inde
TAG
发表于 2025-3-26 14:31:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6620/661994/661994_29.png
痛苦一生
发表于 2025-3-26 17:50:43
Stefano Poggirend Heyting, the foremost disciple of L. E. J. Brouwer, has spoken on intuitionism; Rudolf Carnap of the Vienna Circle has expounded on logicism; Johann (formerly Janos and in a few years to be Johnny) von Neumann has explained Hilbert‘s proof theory-- the so-called formalism; and Hans Hahn has jus