反复无常 发表于 2025-3-27 00:06:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_31.png隐语 发表于 2025-3-27 02:47:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_32.png艰苦地移动 发表于 2025-3-27 06:29:21
The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights eighteenth centuries made the concept of rights theoretically subordinate, not foundational, and, in general, politically impotent. The reason for this is that these rights theories harboured a deep-seated moral conservatism.Ophthalmologist 发表于 2025-3-27 11:04:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_34.png音的强弱 发表于 2025-3-27 14:15:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_35.pngMri485 发表于 2025-3-27 20:24:47
Natural Law and the Construction of Political Sovereignty in Scotland, 1660–1690h political independence, Mackenzie’s arguments subsequently moved the nineteenth-century constitutional historian, Frederic Maitland, to declare that nowhere in the history of political thought was the belief ‘that we perceive intuitively that hereditary monarchy is at all times and in all places tEVICT 发表于 2025-3-28 01:44:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_37.pngCLASH 发表于 2025-3-28 02:55:26
Hobbes and Pufendorf on Natural Equality and Civil Sovereigntytrines of universal human rights.. This tendency to find early traces of egalitarianism in Hobbes’ and Pufendorf’s political theories has led some commentators to accuse them of fraud. Behind this charge has been the belief that the doctrine of natural liberty and equality was — to cite one well-knoanniversary 发表于 2025-3-28 10:20:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_39.png蛰伏 发表于 2025-3-28 12:24:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6619/661864/661864_40.png