fundoplication 发表于 2025-3-21 18:18:00
书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0661781<br><br> <br><br>Abduct 发表于 2025-3-21 22:18:12
Natural Kinds and Natural Kind Reasoning,ry of natural kinds adequate to reflect these concerns, to investigate the logic of natural kinds, and to elaborate a theory of natural kind reasoning. This essay attempts to make a start on this project.excursion 发表于 2025-3-22 03:29:23
Indifference and Induction,n as to which box it is in, the only reasonable distribution of degrees of confidence, is a uniform one of 1/3 to each possibility. It is the purpose of this paper to consider what might be offered by way of a rationale for the principle and how two objections to the principle might be handled.傻 发表于 2025-3-22 04:53:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6618/661781/661781_4.png肮脏 发表于 2025-3-22 10:58:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6618/661781/661781_5.pngExpertise 发表于 2025-3-22 15:41:45
Comments on Thomason,t may well be in our own grasp of the argument. Yet in making this very point, Thomason is already defending one of Feyerabend’s favourite claims — the reasoning processes used by great scientists are remarkably untidy and do not readily compress themselves into neat philosophic formulation.bonnet 发表于 2025-3-22 18:10:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6618/661781/661781_7.png令人苦恼 发表于 2025-3-22 22:37:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6618/661781/661781_8.pngauxiliary 发表于 2025-3-23 04:09:18
Instrumental Theories: Possibilities and Space and Time,ry and all its ontological implications are to be taken seriously. If what seems to be a truth preserving theory implies the existence of atoms and electrons, then we should believe in atoms and electrons, says the realist. If we do not believe in the existential entailments of a theory, then the theory should be discarded.遭遇 发表于 2025-3-23 06:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6618/661781/661781_10.png