健忘症
发表于 2025-3-25 03:26:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6617/661643/661643_21.png
amorphous
发表于 2025-3-25 09:02:49
Bernulf KanitscheiderTI, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Divided into three parts, the first section, ‘The Spirit of SETI Past’, written by the surviving pioneers of this then emerging discipline, reviews the major projects undertaken during the first 50 years of SETI science and the results of that resear
舞蹈编排
发表于 2025-3-25 14:06:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6617/661643/661643_23.png
Psychogenic
发表于 2025-3-25 19:21:54
Bernulf Kanitscheiderical aspects of this highly interdisciplinary intellectual p.This book is a collection of essays written by the very scientists and engineers who have led, and continue to lead, the scientific quest known as SETI, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Divided into three parts, the first sect
包庇
发表于 2025-3-25 23:45:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6617/661643/661643_25.png
allergen
发表于 2025-3-26 01:17:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6617/661643/661643_26.png
fleeting
发表于 2025-3-26 07:43:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6617/661643/661643_27.png
Hormones
发表于 2025-3-26 11:54:47
Bernulf Kanitscheiderical aspects of this highly interdisciplinary intellectual p.This book is a collection of essays written by the very scientists and engineers who have led, and continue to lead, the scientific quest known as SETI, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Divided into three parts, the first sect
情节剧
发表于 2025-3-26 16:08:13
Bernulf Kanitscheidernes and interdisciplines. It provides a critique of literacy studies, including the New Literacy Studies. This book completes a series that the author began in the 1970s. It criticizes and revises the New Literacy Studies and how we think about literacy generally. It is a revisionist study which arg
烧瓶
发表于 2025-3-26 19:00:38
Bernulf Kanitscheidernes and interdisciplines. It provides a critique of literacy studies, including the New Literacy Studies. This book completes a series that the author began in the 1970s. It criticizes and revises the New Literacy Studies and how we think about literacy generally. It is a revisionist study which arg