Tinea-Capitis
发表于 2025-3-25 05:32:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6606/660599/660599_21.png
排名真古怪
发表于 2025-3-25 07:32:22
Kripke’s Paradox of MeaningGiven the common-sense assumption that words possess distinctive meanings — e.g. that Jan’s word, ‘piès’, has the property of . — we can reasonably address ourselves to the question of where such phenomena come from, how facts of this sort are to be explained.. More specifically:
Flatus
发表于 2025-3-25 13:12:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6606/660599/660599_23.png
避开
发表于 2025-3-25 15:49:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6606/660599/660599_24.png
吹牛需要艺术
发表于 2025-3-25 22:55:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6606/660599/660599_25.png
勉强
发表于 2025-3-26 02:29:47
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137400932Kripke; Wittgenstein; Frege; Godel; semantics; modal logic; rigid designators; meaning; necessity; skepticism
重力
发表于 2025-3-26 04:59:20
Modal Paradoxenter received a shipment of entirely different pieces of wood, boxes of nails, and bottles of glue on the day of Albert’s manufacture and went on to construct with these items a table just like Albert in shape and size and so on, the resulting table would not have been Albert.
厚脸皮
发表于 2025-3-26 09:19:35
A Fregean Look at Kripke’s Modal Notion of Meaningof their identity: if the reference of ‘.’ is given by ‘.’, then we know a priori that . is .. Kripke then argues that Frege’s conceptions both of meaning-determination and of reference-determination were wrong, and proposes an alternative picture of reference-determination.
cataract
发表于 2025-3-26 12:47:34
Over-Assignment of Structurer two times the other. As these are the same two temperatures that are being measured, each time in a different scale, we conclude that there is just no fact of the matter in the temperature reality of one body’s temperature being . times the temperature of the other.
粗糙滥制
发表于 2025-3-26 20:45:00
Skeptical Arguments in Hume and Wittgensteinrd is a name. For Hume’s doctrine makes every word a name of a private object, and every language a private language. Also, Wittgenstein has no truck with any absolute notion of a simple idea (a mistaken notion which he traces to Plato’s .), yet Hume made ‘simple ideas’ the basis of all knowledge.