不易燃
发表于 2025-3-30 11:05:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6602/660125/660125_51.png
形容词
发表于 2025-3-30 14:46:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6602/660125/660125_52.png
Indigence
发表于 2025-3-30 17:35:07
Structural Characteristics of Legitimate Partner NGOsnts and donors. When it comes to the accountability of NGOs to their constituency, structural criteria are not as unambiguous. It is argued that NGOs need to be linked to their activist constituency to some extent in order to receive input from the grassroots. But structural criteria do not help in
不可思议
发表于 2025-3-30 23:59:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/67/6602/660125/660125_54.png
急性
发表于 2025-3-31 03:39:13
Insights from Part IVs. And legal accountability must not be confused with normative legitimacy. Structural criteria thus only provide limited normative orientation. In general, they fail to appreciate the fine distinctions amongst the three actor types.
metropolitan
发表于 2025-3-31 08:54:00
Book 2012artners of corporations and it develops a conceptual framework that specifically allows distinguishing legitimate partner NGOs from two related actor types with whom they share certain characteristics but who differ with respect to their legitimacy. These related actor types are interest groups on t
offense
发表于 2025-3-31 10:43:14
Book 2012onsibility (CSR). Yet, unlike the vast majority of academic work on this topic, this book explicitly focuses on clarifying the role of NGOs, not of corporations, in this context. Based on the notion of NGOs as political actors it argues that NGOs suffer from a multiple legitimacy deficit: they are r