开玩笑
发表于 2025-3-26 23:39:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_31.png
沉思的鱼
发表于 2025-3-27 03:49:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_32.png
裂缝
发表于 2025-3-27 08:39:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_33.png
波动
发表于 2025-3-27 12:26:03
Liberal Education and Classical Republicanism,ining their reasons for insisting on the elevated role of the university, McIlwain defends Oakeshott and Strauss from charges of social elitism and highlights the relevance of liberal education in underpinning political moderation. This involves the comparison of Oakeshott’s “conversation of mankind
defendant
发表于 2025-3-27 14:21:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_35.png
thalamus
发表于 2025-3-27 19:25:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_36.png
BURSA
发表于 2025-3-28 01:07:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_37.png
启发
发表于 2025-3-28 02:52:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6327/632675/632675_38.png
上釉彩
发表于 2025-3-28 08:43:34
Leo Strauss and Socratism After Nietzsche and Heidegger,al of a global technological society as the result of the failure of Nietzsche’s call for a new Western nobility. Separating Nietzsche and Heidegger from their polemical elevation of courage against Hobbesian fear of death, Strauss emphasized their commitment to the higher nobility of philosophy. Mc
Harridan
发表于 2025-3-28 10:32:21
Michael Oakeshott and Augustinianism After Hobbes and Hegel,ption of poetic individuality, offering a detailed investigation of how Oakeshott moved between mythology and political theory in combining the thought of Hobbes and Augustine. McIlwain argues that Oakeshott used these two thinkers to separate the human will from the fatalism implied by a completely