Addictive
发表于 2025-3-25 05:53:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6322/632162/632162_21.png
伟大
发表于 2025-3-25 10:36:54
http://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/632162.jpg
表皮
发表于 2025-3-25 13:55:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6322/632162/632162_23.png
弹药
发表于 2025-3-25 17:00:18
e...It is recommended for all students of economics however experienced. ‘ A.W.Coats, Kyklos ‘Professor Pheby in this much needed book gives a brilliant conducted tour ofour subject.‘ G.L.S.Shackle, foreword to the Japanese edition. Pheby has provided an antidote to the dangers of adopting, an exces
粉笔
发表于 2025-3-25 21:24:42
Conclusion,ur own distinct methodologies. We have seen above the long history of ‘naturalism’ within economics, but very few economists have bothered to evaluate critically whether this has benefited economics. There seems to be an implicit belief that if only we can imitate the natural sciences then their success will somehow rub off on to economics.
无节奏
发表于 2025-3-26 02:57:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6322/632162/632162_26.png
认识
发表于 2025-3-26 04:57:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6322/632162/632162_27.png
猛然一拉
发表于 2025-3-26 10:49:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6322/632162/632162_28.png
contradict
发表于 2025-3-26 15:27:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6322/632162/632162_29.png
exercise
发表于 2025-3-26 20:06:56
Inductivism and Deductivism in Economics,ontained within inductivism and deductivism. Secondly, these two methodologies have done much to influence the general tone of economic methodology as something hard, rigorous and naturalistic. Consequently, they will hold important implications as to the type of economics we study.