Gudgeon
发表于 2025-3-28 17:57:09
Knowing Non-existent Natures: A Problem for Aquinas’s Semantics of Essencewe can answer the second question without answering the first, knowing a thing’s essence without knowing whether it exists. This claim is part of a famous argument for the real distinction between essence and existence in creatures, and for the existence of God. But in his later commentaries on Aris
Intend
发表于 2025-3-28 21:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6318/631711/631711_42.png
dendrites
发表于 2025-3-29 01:34:16
Truth and Person in Aquinas’s , i.e., that “true” and “good” are transcendental terms convertible with “being.” I argue that the primary implication that Aquinas draws from this principle is that material creatures are not only intrinsically true and good, but that, in being so, they mediate a personal reality insofar as materia
博爱家
发表于 2025-3-29 06:04:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6318/631711/631711_44.png
尾随
发表于 2025-3-29 08:25:59
Truth as a Transcendentalosophy. The paper begins with a brief survey of analytic views about truth. Then, after setting out the Scholastic doctrine of the transcendentals in general, it explains how truth in particular fits into it, with special attention to the Scholastic distinction between logical truth and ontological
高兴一回
发表于 2025-3-29 11:34:39
Four Notes on the Grammar of Ockham’s Mental Languagely related passages: . V, 8 and . I, 3. In the present paper, I discuss four riddles that are raised by these two texts: (1) I point to an apparent anomaly in the structure of . I, 3 and I propose an amendment to the St. Bonaventure edition in this regard; (2) I argue that Ockham’s main grammatical
僵硬
发表于 2025-3-29 17:40:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6318/631711/631711_47.png
INCH
发表于 2025-3-29 23:23:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6318/631711/631711_48.png
bibliophile
发表于 2025-3-30 03:37:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6318/631711/631711_49.png
FLIRT
发表于 2025-3-30 08:08:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6318/631711/631711_50.png