Abbreviate
发表于 2025-3-25 05:47:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6314/631333/631333_21.png
Grating
发表于 2025-3-25 08:31:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6314/631333/631333_22.png
法律的瑕疵
发表于 2025-3-25 14:51:43
Incommensurability, Circularity and Epistemic Relativism,ut perceptual warrant (e.g. Pryor 2000; 2004; Wright 2008). It is concluded that, while incommensurability arguments can lay claim to a serious threat to the . of our attempts to justify our epistemic principles, this threat to cogency fails to motivate epistemic relativism over dogmatist, conservativist or sceptical alternatives.
hypnotic
发表于 2025-3-25 18:33:58
Metaepistemology and Relativism,ind of relevance to mainstream epistemology, even if more traditional arguments of the sort canvassed in Chapters 3–5 do not. Though the . of relevance is — I’ll argue — of a very different sort than is ordinarily thought.
钢笔记下惩罚
发表于 2025-3-25 23:44:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6314/631333/631333_25.png
SHOCK
发表于 2025-3-26 00:32:03
Global Relativism, dividing line in contemporary thinking about relativism between Boghossian (2006a) and Wright (2008). The conclusion reached in this chapter is that global relativism is ultimately not a defensible view, though this is hardly because (as is often thought) it can be dismissed with a quick ‘knock-down’.
META
发表于 2025-3-26 06:33:49
Metaepistemology and Realism,ter does two central things. The first is to develop a reasoned way of locating revealed second-order commitments in metaepistemology by looking straight to paradigmatic first-order disagreements, and to what is common ground to these disagreements. The second is to show that a pervasive element of
intention
发表于 2025-3-26 12:25:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6314/631333/631333_28.png
内部
发表于 2025-3-26 15:37:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/64/6314/631333/631333_29.png
流眼泪
发表于 2025-3-26 20:38:39
Incommensurability, Circularity and Epistemic Relativism,f epistemic systems. Such arguments can usefully be understood as beginning in the same place as dialogic arguments. But rather than to attempt, as dialogic arguments did, to establish the epistemic relativist’s conclusion by appealing to dialogue facts, incommensurability arguments attempt to get t