ASTER 发表于 2025-3-28 16:39:22
, Henry of Ghent on the Accessibility of Theological Truths,ccessible from another world? Accessibility is a relation, and is defined as relative to possibility. Which conditions determine one world being possible relative to another? We can say that whatever the relation is that makes one world accessible from another, logical possibility is defined by a tyGONG 发表于 2025-3-28 20:35:19
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/629763.jpg宽度 发表于 2025-3-29 01:48:28
,Saint Anselm’s Proof: A Problem of Reference, Intentional Identity and Mutual Understanding,Saint Anselm’s proof for God’s existence in his .,as the label “ontological” retrospectively hung on it indicates, is usually treated as involving some sophisticated problem of, or a much less sophisticated tampering with, the concept of existence. In this paper I intend to approach Saint Anselm’s reasoning from a somewhat different angle.障碍物 发表于 2025-3-29 06:01:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6298/629763/629763_44.pngcoagulate 发表于 2025-3-29 09:46:05
Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times978-94-011-4227-4Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292迅速成长 发表于 2025-3-29 11:52:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4227-4Medieval philosophy; Religion; philosophy of religionConflict 发表于 2025-3-29 16:44:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6298/629763/629763_47.pngexpansive 发表于 2025-3-29 23:46:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6298/629763/629763_48.pngAltitude 发表于 2025-3-30 00:58:25
Certitude or Knowledge of God? Thirteenth-Century Augustinians and the Doctrine of Divine Illuminatfly in mind. To make up for my original indiscretion in putting out the title I did, perhaps I should come clean here at the start and tell you exactly what these general considerations — they are actually general problems I think are faced by all of us as historians of medieval thought — are.