peak-flow
发表于 2025-3-25 05:28:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6292/629120/629120_21.png
无政府主义者
发表于 2025-3-25 10:34:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6292/629120/629120_22.png
技术
发表于 2025-3-25 11:39:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6292/629120/629120_23.png
贪婪的人
发表于 2025-3-25 16:51:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6292/629120/629120_24.png
calamity
发表于 2025-3-25 22:11:47
“We Should Not Lightly Assume”: A Review of Legislative, Regulatory and Jurisprudential Developmentsds arising from the Carter decision. It will also consider whether the objectives articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada are being met by the federal and provincial legislatures in Canada, and whether they reflect sound public policy.
watertight,
发表于 2025-3-26 03:03:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6292/629120/629120_26.png
欢笑
发表于 2025-3-26 08:22:50
Organ Donation After Medical Assistance in Dyingimes it may be morally justifiable to allow an eligible patient to pursue MAiD because they wish to donate their organs after death. Noting that more research is needed, I close with several recommendations for policy and practice.
Inscrutable
发表于 2025-3-26 12:27:46
The Assessment and Relief of Suffering in the Shadow of MAIDthe multiple opportunities available to ‘relieve often and comfort always.’ Finally, we review evidence on the impact of MAID suggesting that the overall burden of suffering in Canada has increased since legalization.
津贴
发表于 2025-3-26 13:22:55
Integrating Medical Assistance in Dying into Health Care: Processes and Challengescisional bottlenecks and frustrating delays in accessing this service. This chapter critically evaluates the challenges at each stage of implementation of MAiD in Canada with Ontario as an illustrative example.
出价
发表于 2025-3-26 16:55:11
Radical Autonomy in Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudencey. This essay uses the term radical autonomy to refer to a view of autonomy that is defined by freedom from any comprehensive moral anthropology. This chapter will outline the movement towards radical autonomy at the Supreme Court of Canada, which arguably culminated in the 2015 . (. . (.).) decisio