ANT 发表于 2025-3-25 03:47:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6282/628188/628188_21.png

讥笑 发表于 2025-3-25 07:50:01

http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6282/628188/628188_22.png

ornithology 发表于 2025-3-25 14:15:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6282/628188/628188_23.png

松鸡 发表于 2025-3-25 19:00:07

Conclusion,release of . (2015). The document shows that the Australia Council for the Arts has recognized that quantitative evaluation cannot tell the whole story about arts engagement by Australians. The conclusion speculates that such a move may signal a re-evaluation of what data should be captured in relat

GNAT 发表于 2025-3-25 22:28:29

Book 2017portunity to rethink the traditional process of reporting back on value and impact through the singular entity of funds acquittal.  Using three commissioned evaluations as examples, the discussion outlines the two positions most often adopted by researchers/evaluators, external and distanced or embe

使混合 发表于 2025-3-26 01:58:06

Introduction, a broker in the dissemination process? These questions need to be asked to enable evaluators, partners, funding bodies, and policy makers to gain traction in understanding the value of arts and cultural engagement to individuals, families, and communities, and its impact on them.

易于 发表于 2025-3-26 04:47:52

dens the discussion beyond fiscal markers of impact.DemonstrThis book investigates the relationship developed between the researcher/evaluator and the commissioning arts and cultural producer in providing an opportunity to rethink the traditional process of reporting back on value and impact through

IST 发表于 2025-3-26 08:32:37

Evaluation Within the Australian Landscape,anguage attributed to development of cultural indicators is framed predominantly in an economic context and questions whether building online applications such as . for arts organizations to gather data about the value and impact of arts and culture is a worthwhile endeavour.

flammable 发表于 2025-3-26 15:50:42

Reframing the Position of the Evaluator,ted by researchers/evaluators – external and distanced or embedded and collaborative – and will argue the merits and deficiencies of the two approaches. The chapter also discusses how the embedded and collaborative approach can be aligned with the notion of co-production of research.

任意 发表于 2025-3-26 16:52:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6282/628188/628188_30.png
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Measuring Impact; Models for Evaluatio Sandra Gattenhof Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Arts Evaluation.Brok