装勇敢地做 发表于 2025-3-27 00:32:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6281/628004/628004_31.png戏服 发表于 2025-3-27 04:05:56
Rules in Dialogue,ogical rules. In Chaps. . and ., I argued that standard inferentialist accounts do not suffice to provide justification of basic logical rules. In response, an analysis of logical inference as acts taking place in dialogical situations is provided, by taking interactions to be structured around moveENNUI 发表于 2025-3-27 05:35:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6281/628004/628004_33.pngencomiast 发表于 2025-3-27 12:46:03
Paradox, Paraconsistency and Logical Revision,hat what is typically thought to be captured by paraconsistency and paracompleteness is best understood as a form of epistemological instability that can be dealt with in the context of the dialogical dynamics of reasoning. This is used to motivate an approach called paracoherence, which can deal wi我不死扛 发表于 2025-3-27 15:16:56
James TraffordOffers a comprehensive introduction to inferentialism in logic.Situates logic and reasoning in the context of dialogue.Discusses a novel approach to logical paradox and logical revision.Uses technique好色 发表于 2025-3-27 20:49:54
Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethicshttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/628004.jpg相反放置 发表于 2025-3-27 23:23:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47205-8Inferentialism in Logic; Inferentialist Semantics; Rules in Dialogue; Logical Revision; Dynamics of ReasAbominate 发表于 2025-3-28 03:25:36
978-3-319-83679-9Springer International Publishing AG 2017不法行为 发表于 2025-3-28 06:17:43
Meaning in Dialogue978-3-319-47205-8Series ISSN 2192-6255 Series E-ISSN 2192-6263Stress 发表于 2025-3-28 11:46:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6281/628004/628004_40.png