botany
发表于 2025-3-25 05:38:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6280/627996/627996_21.png
外表读作
发表于 2025-3-25 11:25:38
Gabriele Usbertiontrol, and metastasis. A more detailed understanding of these processes may ultimately translate into the development of novel approaches for the detection and control of ovarian cancer..978-1-4614-2473-4978-0-387-98094-2Series ISSN 0927-3042 Series E-ISSN 2509-8497
尽责
发表于 2025-3-25 12:40:47
ontrol, and metastasis. A more detailed understanding of these processes may ultimately translate into the development of novel approaches for the detection and control of ovarian cancer..978-1-4614-2473-4978-0-387-98094-2Series ISSN 0927-3042 Series E-ISSN 2509-8497
Thyroid-Gland
发表于 2025-3-25 18:36:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6280/627996/627996_24.png
Coterminous
发表于 2025-3-25 22:51:33
Meaning and Justification. An Internalist Theory of Meaning
osteoclasts
发表于 2025-3-26 01:06:30
Motivations for an Internalist Semantics,a variant of it, and Prawitz’s objection to Tarskian definition of logical consequence. In Sect. . two alternative views of the scope of an internalist semantics are introduced, and reasons are adduced to prefer the second, ‘thick semantics’, to the first, ‘thin semantics’. In the Conclusion the pos
荣幸
发表于 2025-3-26 06:57:40
Varieties of Semantical Anti-realism,nd the meaning of the logical constants are outlined in Sect. ., while Sect. . presents the neo-verificationist program(s) for a theory of meaning elaborated by Dummett, Prawitz and Martin-Löf as the outgrowth of some basic results in proof-theory like normalization theorems for natural deduction sy
花争吵
发表于 2025-3-26 09:06:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6280/627996/627996_28.png
颠簸下上
发表于 2025-3-26 14:16:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6280/627996/627996_29.png
翅膀拍动
发表于 2025-3-26 20:23:54
Book 2023fic distinction, Gettier’s problems, the paradox of knowability, and the characterization oftruth. On a more general philosophical level, throughout the book the author develops a tight critique of the neo-verificationism of Dummett, Prawitz and Martin-Löf, and defends a mentalist interpretation of