Flinch
发表于 2025-3-25 05:54:21
Violations of International Law and Responsibility of Statesson with the Congo‘s failure to comply with its obligation under Article 146 of the IVth Geneva Convention (investigating and prosecuting charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on its territory). The Congo did not come to the International Court with clean hands, and its Application should have been rejected. ..
cancer
发表于 2025-3-25 11:20:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6279/627843/627843_22.png
HEED
发表于 2025-3-25 12:21:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6279/627843/627843_23.png
B-cell
发表于 2025-3-25 19:36:16
Law of the Seadelimitation to be carried out will be one between the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone belonging to each of the Parties, areas in which States have only sovereign rights and functional jurisdiction. Thus both Parties have differentiated between a southern and a northern sector.
完全
发表于 2025-3-25 22:10:12
Self–Determination no matter how persuasively claimed on the basis of old legal instruments and exercises of authority, cannot - except in the most extraordinary circumstances - prevail in law over the rights of non–self–governing people to claim independence and establish their sovereignty through the exercise of bona fide self–determination.
Alcove
发表于 2025-3-26 01:56:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6279/627843/627843_26.png
narcotic
发表于 2025-3-26 05:34:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6279/627843/627843_27.png
细查
发表于 2025-3-26 10:10:23
Law of Treatiession of the understanding of the parties at the time of signature. In the circumstances of this case the Court has come to the conclusion that the Anglo–Ottoman Convention does represent evidence of the views of Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire as to the factual extent of the authority of the Al–Thani Ruler in Qatar up to 1913.
hereditary
发表于 2025-3-26 13:54:29
Human Rightse right under Article 36 as a human right renders the effectiveness of this provision even more imperative”. The Court having found that the United States violated the rights accorded by Article 36, paragraph 1, to the LaGrand brothers, it does not appear necessary to it to consider the additional argument developed by Germany in this regard.
星星
发表于 2025-3-26 20:26:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6279/627843/627843_30.png