Conjuction
发表于 2025-3-26 21:42:31
978-3-030-06663-5Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
CRP743
发表于 2025-3-27 04:49:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6268/626765/626765_32.png
milligram
发表于 2025-3-27 06:23:12
http://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/626765.jpg
庇护
发表于 2025-3-27 12:43:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6268/626765/626765_34.png
exhibit
发表于 2025-3-27 17:32:57
Ubiratan D’Ambrosioions in appropriate frames), while others relate to the introduction of a general deformation field (“material” writing of fields). Finally, there are difficulties connected with the inherent complexity of some of the behaviors (e.g., hysteresis), and even more so, the non-unique thermodynamical fra
能量守恒
发表于 2025-3-27 17:49:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6268/626765/626765_36.png
结果
发表于 2025-3-27 23:29:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6268/626765/626765_37.png
大酒杯
发表于 2025-3-28 02:11:30
Célia Maria Carolino Pires,Elenilton Vieira Godoy,Marcio Antonio da Silva,Vinício de Macedo Santosion 2 we answer questions from papers by Ax and Mundy concerning the logical status of faster than light motion (FTL) in relativity. We claim that already very small/weak fragments of . prove “.”. In section 3 we give a sketchy outlook for the possibility of generalizing . to theories permitting acc
Embolic-Stroke
发表于 2025-3-28 08:33:30
Barbara L. Bianchini,Lilian Nasser,Lourdes Onuchic,Sonia B. C. Iglioriduced geometry is Euclidean. In particular, there is no three-dimensional differential geometry leading to an account of non-Euclidean space..Gauss, by contrast, possessed a scientist’s conviction in the possibility of a non-Euclidean geometry which was no less, and no greater, than that of Schweika
Tempor
发表于 2025-3-28 12:53:31
Cristiane Coppe de Oliveira,Cláudia Regina Flores,Daniel Clark Orey,Maria Cristina Araújo de Oliveirduced geometry is Euclidean. In particular, there is no three-dimensional differential geometry leading to an account of non-Euclidean space..Gauss, by contrast, possessed a scientist’s conviction in the possibility of a non-Euclidean geometry which was no less, and no greater, than that of Schweika