裂口 发表于 2025-3-23 12:25:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626591/626591_11.pngValves 发表于 2025-3-23 15:06:47
ct, which covers the time between Berthollet’s law of mass action of 1801 and that of Guldberg and Waage as formulated in 1879, one usually forgets to mention the electrochemical affinity theory which dominated that period.. Thermochemistry, although not neglected, is historically closely related toSEED 发表于 2025-3-23 21:29:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626591/626591_13.pngexpire 发表于 2025-3-24 00:11:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626591/626591_14.pngConsequence 发表于 2025-3-24 02:35:00
the nineteenth century.. This neglect is probably due to the sterility of these proposals and the fact that gravitation as a separate field of reseach did not exist during this period. This paper does not aim at filling this gap by treating any of these theories in detail or by presenting a generalEtymology 发表于 2025-3-24 08:03:52
the nineteenth century.. This neglect is probably due to the sterility of these proposals and the fact that gravitation as a separate field of reseach did not exist during this period. This paper does not aim at filling this gap by treating any of these theories in detail or by presenting a generalwhite-matter 发表于 2025-3-24 11:39:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626591/626591_17.pngagonist 发表于 2025-3-24 18:09:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626591/626591_18.pngDislocation 发表于 2025-3-24 19:27:27
sequently motion. My concern in this chapter will be mainly the nature of a special kind of motion, i.e., the inertial, since it is at this point that the informative character of Newton’s physics is most strikingly exhibited. I’ll argue that there is no motion (or rest) in his physics which is uncadebacle 发表于 2025-3-25 01:18:31
g possible? If we define it, as we tend to, as that which does not involve any contradiction or impossibility were it to actualise, it would follow that almost anything is possible. If this is a view too wild to hold, its presupposition must be rejected, and this presupposition is that what is thus