Harrowing 发表于 2025-3-23 10:25:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_11.png火光在摇曳 发表于 2025-3-23 16:10:05
Kostis Karantias,Aggelos Kiayias,Dionysis Zindrose will not so much focus on “proof” in the sense of proof theory but rather on “proof” in its original intuitive meaning in mathematical practice, that is, understood as “a sequence of thoughts convincing a sound mind” as Gödel (1953, p. 341) expressed it. Call provability in the former sense . . an一起平行 发表于 2025-3-23 19:24:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_13.pngFluctuate 发表于 2025-3-23 23:26:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_14.png跳脱衣舞的人 发表于 2025-3-24 04:06:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_15.pnginquisitive 发表于 2025-3-24 07:07:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_16.png很像弓] 发表于 2025-3-24 11:46:30
Toshiko Matsui,Lewis Gudgeonural and cognitive capacities was inspired by the explanatory role of flow charts and computer simulations in the cognitive psychology of the 1960s, and his (1974) defence of non-reductionist physicalism rested in part on the promises of computer models in cognitive psychology. As he put it, ‘the cl消毒 发表于 2025-3-24 18:12:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_18.png面包屑 发表于 2025-3-24 21:07:17
Michael Zargham,Krzysztof Paruch,Jamsheed Shorishechnological complexity and ubiquity have transformed the very nature of philosophical inquiry. The guiding assumption that runs throughout the volume is that the long-standing divide between analytic and continental philosophy needs to be overcome. The wisdom found within the different traditions o采纳 发表于 2025-3-25 00:54:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6266/626571/626571_20.png