HEW 发表于 2025-3-23 10:38:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6262/626196/626196_11.pngIncompetent 发表于 2025-3-23 16:44:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6262/626196/626196_12.png阉割 发表于 2025-3-23 18:19:57
András KornaiAims to teach linguistics to the reader but presumes only knowledge of mathematics at the undergraduate level.The material was hitherto available only in the research literature.Wide applicability in无动于衷 发表于 2025-3-23 22:36:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6262/626196/626196_14.pnginculpate 发表于 2025-3-24 05:41:54
The elements,le. Typically, this is done by means of . the set in question, a definitional method that we introduce in Section 2.1 by means of examples and counterexamples that show the similarities and the differences between the standard mathematical use of the term ‘generate’ and the way it is employed in linguistics.协议 发表于 2025-3-24 09:06:05
Introduction,mal syntax (Chomsky 1961, Hiż 1961), logical semantics (Quine 1961, Curry 1961), phonetics and phonology (Peterson and Harary 1961, Halle 1961), Markov models (Mandelbrot 1961b), handwriting (Chao 1961, Eden 1961), parsing (Oettinger 1961, Yngve 1961), glottochronology (Gleason 1961), and the philostenosynovitis 发表于 2025-3-24 10:46:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6262/626196/626196_17.png补助 发表于 2025-3-24 17:52:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6262/626196/626196_18.png去世 发表于 2025-3-24 22:50:13
Morphology,stics from a mathematical perspective: radical typological differences, flexible boundaries, and near-truths. Mild typological differences are common to most fields of study. For example, the internal organs of different primates are easily distinguished by experts yet differ only mildly, so that acathartic 发表于 2025-3-24 23:33:28
Syntax,ery clear that . is a sentence of ordinary English, while four other permutations of these three elements, *., *., *., and *., are outside the bounds of ordinary English. The remaining one, ., is harder to pass judgment on, but it seems clear that its stylistic value is very different from that of t