翻动
发表于 2025-3-26 22:27:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_31.png
阶层
发表于 2025-3-27 04:33:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_32.png
Confidential
发表于 2025-3-27 07:59:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_33.png
OTTER
发表于 2025-3-27 12:53:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_34.png
Diatribe
发表于 2025-3-27 15:15:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_35.png
clarify
发表于 2025-3-27 20:30:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_36.png
incision
发表于 2025-3-28 01:44:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_37.png
Inscrutable
发表于 2025-3-28 04:12:03
icted the relevance of the principle for a new subject of international law: the individual. Almost fifty years later, this article reviews how the principle has fared in international criminal law, a field of international law relevant both to states and to the individual. The review shows how the
观点
发表于 2025-3-28 08:15:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6259/625805/625805_39.png
高度
发表于 2025-3-28 12:04:52
ises and what are the typical conditions under which the term ‘crisis’ is invoked? Is international law a vivid field of law due to and thanks to crises? Are parts of international law maybe in crisis themselves? To what extent has the focus on crises taken away attention from important legal questi