为现场
发表于 2025-3-23 09:59:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6257/625670/625670_11.png
anthropologist
发表于 2025-3-23 16:54:02
Engaging Devices: The Inter-articulation of Technology, Democracy and Innovation,relation to material participation. The latter form of involvement as I discussed in Chapter 1, can itself be characterized in terms of the attempt to foreground the role of objects, technologies and settings in the organization of publics. There is also a second, similarly ‘reflexive’, reason why t
angina-pectoris
发表于 2025-3-23 20:18:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6257/625670/625670_13.png
prostatitis
发表于 2025-3-23 22:32:41
Eco-homes as Instruments of Material Politics: Engagement, Innovation, Change,uestion of whether these beings qualified as actors (Harbers, 2005; Latour, 1992; Callon, 1986b; Cussins, 1996). They proposed that non-human entities deserved more recognition as constituent elements of social and political life and this recognition was made to hinge on their capacities for action.
高兴一回
发表于 2025-3-24 03:02:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6257/625670/625670_15.png
committed
发表于 2025-3-24 10:04:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6257/625670/625670_16.png
净礼
发表于 2025-3-24 14:06:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6257/625670/625670_17.png
thalamus
发表于 2025-3-24 17:36:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6257/625670/625670_18.png
Gossamer
发表于 2025-3-24 19:02:58
,Sustainable Living Experiments or a ‘Coming Out’ for the Politics of Things,pe of diagnosis. This literature draws on the social studies of science and technology to develop a broader analysis of the role of public experiments, tests, trials and empirical presentations in social and political life (Barry, 1998; Girard and Stark, 2007; Rosental, 2005; Latour, 2005b; Muniesa
讽刺
发表于 2025-3-24 23:54:44
Eco-homes as Instruments of Material Politics: Engagement, Innovation, Change,ent, in particular settings and at certain times. From this vantage point, there is another problem with the debate about non-human agency besides anthropomorphism: it wrongly suggests that the crucial issue is whether nonhumans are ‘naturally’ endowed with capacities for socially or politically sig