glans-penis
发表于 2025-3-23 11:51:25
Book 2005y when compared with either classical or neoclassical economics. On the other hand, Marx‘s theory of money has also been severely criticized, especially that it seems to require that money be a produced commodity. The contributors to the volume provide a wide-ranging and in-depth appraisal of the st
jealousy
发表于 2025-3-23 17:52:26
978-1-349-51857-9Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005
诱惑
发表于 2025-3-23 20:13:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6251/625007/625007_13.png
光明正大
发表于 2025-3-23 22:57:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6251/625007/625007_14.png
MOAN
发表于 2025-3-24 04:07:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6251/625007/625007_15.png
财主
发表于 2025-3-24 09:38:03
Marx’s Theory of Money in Historical Perspectivetheory of money has been the subject of a substantial number of books and articles in the last 35 years. Among others de Brunhoff (1976), Foley (1983), Arnon (1984), and Itoh and Lapavitsas (1998). This work shows that the theory of money is an indispensable part of Marx’s theory of value, and among the most original aspects of Marx’s economics.
Iatrogenic
发表于 2025-3-24 10:42:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6251/625007/625007_17.png
Hot-Flash
发表于 2025-3-24 17:18:17
The Monetary Aspects of the Capitalist Process in the Marxian System: An Investigation from the Poin not enough even, because what he offers is . where production, circulation and distribution are deeply affected by money and finance, so that any dichotomy between the ‘real’ and the ‘monetary’ is futile. Indeed, if there is an author for whom the label . is appropriate, this is Marx.
道学气
发表于 2025-3-24 21:08:42
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523999economics; Marx; transformation
拍下盗公款
发表于 2025-3-25 00:24:49
Marx’s Explanation of Money’s Functions: Overturning the Quantity Theoryey is credit money. This is the position of Tooke and his followers, with whom Marx so clearly sides in the . According to Marx, their refutation of the quantity theory is incomplete because they jumble both money with capital and money’s different aspects with each other.. Marx corrects the first o