Airtight
发表于 2025-3-23 12:49:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624966/624966_11.png
MITE
发表于 2025-3-23 15:21:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624966/624966_12.png
巡回
发表于 2025-3-23 20:48:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624966/624966_13.png
小样他闲聊
发表于 2025-3-23 23:52:26
,The Marxian Imprint on Early IR’s Understandings of Imperialism,narrative that depicts the formative years of the discipline as merely liberal idealist and only focused on the theme of internationalism. It is also important because the Marxian clout on the thinkers considered in this chapter has received very limited attention in the field.
强化
发表于 2025-3-24 02:22:09
Norman Angell and the Real First Great Debate,oretical force in the genesis of the discipline. The chapter contributes to reconstruct some of the early IR disciplinary dialogues which have been disregarded, and retrieves Angell’s views on the Marxist insights in relation to historical materialism, the nexus between capitalism and imperialism, and the socialist remedy to imperialism.
TRUST
发表于 2025-3-24 08:50:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624966/624966_16.png
granite
发表于 2025-3-24 12:00:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624966/624966_17.png
被告
发表于 2025-3-24 15:38:25
Introduction,ration of so-called liberal idealists. Since the late 1990s, however, a growing revisionist literature has challenged both of these assumptions. This chapter presents the most important revisionist efforts that have been done in the discipline with regards to its early years, and it identifies one k
肌肉
发表于 2025-3-24 22:05:33
,The Benchmark Thinkers’ Impact on IR, It contextualizes their thought and writings by highlighting their impact on and engagement with intellectuals, themes, and institutions related to International Relations (IR). It shows that even though most of them were not academics, they were certainly IR thinkers. The analysis also highlights
AFFIX
发表于 2025-3-25 00:46:27
Political Thought and Marxism, were characterized by a school of thought called liberal idealism. This chapter explores the political thought of Hobson, Brailsford, Woolf, Laski, and Angell to discern whether or not they are correctly portrayed as liberal idealist. It also analyzes the closeness of their thinking to socialism an