Spouse
发表于 2025-3-21 17:43:01
书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0624919<br><br> <br><br>
乳汁
发表于 2025-3-21 20:53:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624919/624919_2.png
RACE
发表于 2025-3-22 04:04:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624919/624919_3.png
Genistein
发表于 2025-3-22 08:21:46
Conclusionquently lost the money gambling, or down a sewer). In some respects my overall evaluation of Marx’s theories of human nature takes this form, except that the bad news is not always as bad as the good is good, and the process of evaluation is not intended to be, nor, hopefully, will be taken as, a joke.
Aphorism
发表于 2025-3-22 12:10:58
Introductiond their own labour. This indifference must be explained .-logically — at least in good part — and presumably such an explanation must in turn rely heavily upon assumptions about human nature in general.
CLAP
发表于 2025-3-22 15:59:09
Knowledge or immediate, as philosophical “empiricists” have usually claimed, or only mediated through collective and individual praxes? If the latter is the case, what are these praxes and precisely how do they relate to individuals’ knowledge?
Carcinoma
发表于 2025-3-22 18:31:36
A General Psychology of Intergroup Relationsg of individuals as chickens and groups as eggs is only an analytical device. Groups are . chickens. Indeed, as we saw in Chapter 1, for Marx the most primeval chickens — and those most important for historic change — are groups rather than individuals, and on numerous occasions we shall have to acknowledge this fact.
CAND
发表于 2025-3-22 23:21:06
Introduction expand (automatically). That such individuals are also the conscious and active producers of their own social relations and ideology, who . that (certain of) their needs be met and (sometimes) become . of social change when these needs are . met, has often been lost in the fray.
叫喊
发表于 2025-3-23 05:19:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6250/624919/624919_9.png
GNAW
发表于 2025-3-23 08:16:48
http://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/624919.jpg