主讲人
发表于 2025-3-30 11:52:02
Manfred Aulle, but only partially true. The purpose of this book was to demonstrate that the nature and self-awareness of the church should be perceived not as a still picture, but as a dynamic reality. A still picture of the church, when dogmatized, induces an insensitivity to the plurality of the world and an
EXULT
发表于 2025-3-30 16:14:47
Melanie Gippe last 15 years, theories integrating ecosystem and spatial dynamics have quickly coalesced into meta-ecosystem theories, the focus of this book...The book will be of interest to graduate students and researchers who wish to learn more about the synthesis of ecosystem and spatial dynamics, which for
箴言
发表于 2025-3-30 16:36:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6245/624489/624489_53.png
Capture
发表于 2025-3-31 00:44:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6245/624489/624489_54.png
吼叫
发表于 2025-3-31 01:25:37
Uwe Hannig,Klaus Heinzelbecker,Thomas Foellourse is then developed in terms of a modified intuitionism of the kind outlined by W. D. Ross, ‘good‘ being explained as the name of a consequential property, ‘right‘ in terms of moral suitability, and moral obligations as consisting in our being constrained to act in certain ways by facts we apprehend to co978-94-017-5067-7978-94-017-5065-3
Project
发表于 2025-3-31 07:56:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6245/624489/624489_56.png
Aggrandize
发表于 2025-3-31 09:53:16
Gerrit Ahlers,Marc Bernath,Martin Handschuh,Steffen Oder of reason and have rejected the claim to intuitive moral knowledge on this among other grounds. They are to be refuted by examining the nature of reason and determining its powers, and also by noting what goes on in moral deliberation, in particular, how we come to accept new moral insights and to
ferment
发表于 2025-3-31 15:46:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6245/624489/624489_58.png
Invertebrate
发表于 2025-3-31 18:54:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6245/624489/624489_59.png
全神贯注于
发表于 2025-3-31 23:32:02
Simone Braundigm uses of moral expressions, that Hare with his prescriptivist theory sees analogies between imperatives and moral judgments, and, as a result misleadingly over-assimilates the two sorts of discourse, and that Nowell-Smith accurately reports certain non-moral uses of ‘good’ and ‘ought’ and confus