ALOFT
发表于 2025-3-23 12:57:08
Guy L. Curry,Richard M. Feldmanh the position advanced in Chapter 2, any consideration of class should start with an exploration of the conceptual dynamics of this term. Against this backdrop, the work of Max Weber continues to be of value because it offers a methodological guide to the formation of concepts, and beyond this cont
conquer
发表于 2025-3-23 16:59:12
ieved if system trust and—beyond that—system loyalty exist. System trust is not the same as system loyalty. The latter is based on compliance with the value relationships of the institutional order. These values are related to individual civil rights and to their realization in the framework of soli
新奇
发表于 2025-3-23 19:22:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6237/623651/623651_13.png
胡言乱语
发表于 2025-3-24 01:44:23
Book 20091st editionodels of manufacturing and production systems. It is an out growth of the efforts within the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department at Texas A&M to develop and teach an analytically based undergraduate course on probabilisticmodeling of m- ufacturingtype systems. The level of this textbook is
impaction
发表于 2025-3-24 04:45:25
roblem solutions and computer codes to support the instructoThis textbook was developed to ?ll the need for an accessible but comprehensive presentation of the analytical approaches for modeling and analyzing models of manufacturing and production systems. It is an out growth of the efforts within t
完整
发表于 2025-3-24 10:31:58
of Hegel’s philosophy, thereby ignoring the way his thought marks a fundamental break with the philosophical tradition as a whole. Stirner’s notions of ‘egoism’, ‘ownness’ and ‘.’ (‘the ego’) were not philosophical concepts but, in a Foucauldian sense, tools to dismantle the subject-object dichotomy
Barter
发表于 2025-3-24 13:12:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6237/623651/623651_17.png
Confess
发表于 2025-3-24 18:32:08
Guy L. Curry,Richard M. Feldman . (.) was described as the ‘most revolutionary book ever written’.. It is certainly the most dangerous. In marking a break with all established categories and traditions of thought — Hegelianism, humanism, rationalism — and in demolishing our most deeply entrenched notions of morality, subjectivity
蚀刻
发表于 2025-3-24 21:31:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/63/6237/623651/623651_19.png
悲痛
发表于 2025-3-25 02:29:58
Guy L. Curry,Richard M. Feldmanof Hegel’s philosophy, thereby ignoring the way his thought marks a fundamental break with the philosophical tradition as a whole. Stirner’s notions of ‘egoism’, ‘ownness’ and ‘.’ (‘the ego’) were not philosophical concepts but, in a Foucauldian sense, tools to dismantle the subject-object dichotomy